JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Outline of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
The "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" adopted by the Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC) on July 19, 2000 is a rule in connection with the resolution of disputes between a registrant and any third party (complainant) relating to the registration of a JP domain name. This Center is an organization approved by JPNIC as a dispute-resolution service provider. The dispute resolution proceedings shall be conducted by this Center in accordance with the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy," the "Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy," and the "Supplementary Rules" and the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Fee Rules" which are provided by this Center.
In the case where the complaint requests that the registration of the JP domain name in question be transferred to the complaint or cancelled, this Center shall conduct the proceedings to render a decision by a single or three member panel in neutral and impartial position. The resolution of the dispute can be achieved in the short term, since the panel renders a decision within fourteen (14) business days from the date of its appointment.
In the case where a decision of transfer or cancellation is rendered, the Japan Registry Service Co., Ltd (JPRS) shall transfer the registration to the complainant or cancel the registration based on the decision, except that the registrant of the domain name has filed a lawsuit with the jurisdictional court against the decision within ten (10) business days from the notice of the decision. In the case where a decision is rendered that the application has no ground, the registration shall be maintained.
Process Flow of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution

*JPRS shall inform the complainant, registrant, and this Center of the implementation date of the decision, immediately after its receipt of the notice of decision.
Agents
It is possible for parties themselves to make an application for the proceedings of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution and an answer thereto or through their agents. It is possible to appoint attorneys-at-law or patent attorneys as an agent. This Center is designated by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry as an arbitral organization in which patent attorneys are able to act as an agent independently under Article 4, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 2 of the Patent Attorney Law.
Panelists
This Center'fs panelist candidates ¦1 for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution consist of attorneys-at-law, patent attorneys, and academic experts. Those who are appointed as panelists will address the resolution of disputes, taking advantage of their own expertise and experiences. See the list and background information of panelist candidates here.
In the case where either party (the complainant or the domain name registrant) chooses a three member panel, this Center shall, in principle, appoint one panelist from the lists of candidates submitted by both parties. The third panelist shall be appointed as a chief panelist from among five candidates who have been presented to both parties by this Center.
In the case where both parties (the complainant or the domain name registrant) do not choose a three member panel, this Center shall appoint one panelist from this Center's list of panelists.
*1 Since they become panelists only after the commencement of the proceedings of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution and their subsequent appointment as panelists, they are referred to as panelist candidates until their appointments have been confirmed.
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
The complainant shall submit a written application to this Center against the registrant of the JP domain name, in accordance with the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" the "Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy," and the "Supplementary Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy."
In the case where the complainant submits a written application to this Center, the registrant has an obligation to follow these dispute resolution proceedings, pursuant to the registration rules of JPNIC which refer to the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. The complainant and the registrant may entrust these dispute resolution proceedings to an agent.
In order to simplify the submission procedure of a written application and a written answer, this Center provides the following model formats for a written application and a written answer. Please use these formats when the complainant and the registrant go through the procedure.
Format for Application
Please download the model format of a written application (a word file), fill it out, and electronically transmit it as an e-mail attachment to the e-mail addres:jpdomain-disputes@ip-adr.gr.jp which this Center has designated.
In addition, please print out the prepared written application in word file format (a signature and seal of the complainant or its agent are required), and send one original copy of three duplicates thereof (five duplicates in cases that are heard by a three member panel) to this Center by certified e-mail. Each original copy and duplicate shall be accompanied by the relevant documents which have not been able to be sent by e-mail.
Format for Answer
Please download the model format of a written answer (a word file) , fill it out, and electronically transmit it as an e-mail attachment to the e-mail addres:jpdomain-disputes@ip-adr.gr.jp which this Center has designated.
In addition, please print out the prepared written answer in word file format (a signature and seal of the complainant or its agent are required), and send one original copy of three duplicates thereof (five duplicates in cases that are heard by a three member panel) to this Center by certified e-mail. Each original copy and duplicate shall be accompanied by the relevant documents which are not able to be sent by e-mail.
Fees for Domain Name Dispute Resolution
This Center's fees are as follows. The fees as set forth in this section should be paid to the bank account. For more information, please refer to the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Fee Rules." As for the procedure or fees after a decision of transfer is rendered, please contact the registration organization (JPRS).
(1)Application Fee (Tax included)
1. In cases that are heard by one (1) panelist
The application fee to be paid by the applicant shall be 189,000 yen. (Provided however, in cases where the number of the subject domain names in the same written application is four or more, 10,500 yen for each additional domain beyond the fourth domain shall be assessed.)
2. In cases that are heard by three (3) panelists
The application fee to be paid by the applicant shall be 378,000 yen. (Provided however, in cases where the number of the subject domain names in the same written application is four or more, 21,000 yen for each additional domain beyond the fourth domain shall be assessed.)
In cases where the registrant chooses to increase the number of panelists from one to three in a written answer, it shall pay the same amount of fee as paid by the complainant to this Center.
(2)Hearing Fee (Tax included)
In the case where hearing proceedings have been initiated, the complainant and registrant shall each pay to this Center 15,750 yen as the relevant hearing fee, before the date of hearing.
(3)Other Costs (Tax included)
Costs associated with, interpretation, expert testimony, daily allowance for witnesses, traveling expenses and accommodation costs in the case of panelists' business trip, and the like, shall be borne equally by the complainant and registrant, and shall be paid to this Center in advance.
(4)Once the fee has been paid to this Center such fee is non-refundable. Provided however, in the case where an application is withdrawn before the appointment of panelists, a refund, minus a 31,500 yen deduction, will be made to the complainant and in the case where an application is withdrawn after the appointment of panelists has been made, yet before a decision has been rendered, an amount decided at this Center's discretion, and taking into consideration the progress of the case up to that point, shall be reimbursed to the complainant.
Beneficiary Bank Account
Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center
Mitsui Sumitomo Bank Kasumigaseki branch office
Ordinary Deposit Account No. 6559091
Formats and Samples for Proceedings of Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Please see the following formats for the proceedings of Domain Name Dispute Resolution.
(1)Written Application for Domain Name Dispute Resolution
(2)Written Answer to Proceedings of Domain Name Dispute Resolution
(3)Power of Attorney (Japanese)
Please refer to the following samples which are provided as supplementary materials to show how to fill out each format
(1)Sample of Written Application for Domain Name Dispute Resolution (In the process of being created. Thank you for your patience.)
(2)Sample of Written Answer to Proceedings of Domain Name Dispute Resolution (In the process of being created. Thank you for your patience.)
Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution shall be conducted in accordance with the following policies and rules.
(1)JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(2)Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(3)Supplementary Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(4)JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Fee Rules
FAQ of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Application for a decision
Application for a decision
- What kind of application can be made to the Center in connection with a JP Domain Name Dispute (dispute relating to domain name between a registrant of domain name and a third party, arising out of the registration and use of a JP domain name) ?
- It is possible to make an application for a decision of transfer or cancellation of a JP domain name registration, in the case where a registered domain name which is the subject of a JP domain name dispute, is identical or confusingly similar to any mark such as trademark or service mark in which a third party has rights or legitimate interests, and the registrant has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to registration of such domain name, and such domain name of the registrant has been registered or is being used in bad faith.
Types of application
- Is it possible to make an application for a decision to the Center with respect to registration of domain names other than JP domain names, such as,"com" or ".org"?
- In the Center, only the registration of JP domain names shall be the subject of an application for a decision. An application for a decision with respect to registration of domain names other than JP domain names can be made to other providers, such as, WIPO, NAF, CPR, and ADNDRC. For more information, please contact each organization.
Number of copies of a written application
- How many copies of a written application shall be submitted to the Center, upon submission of a written application for a decision with respect to registration of JP domain name?
- In cases that are heard by one (1) panelist, one original copy of a written application and three duplicates thereof shall be submitted.
In cases that are heard by three (3) panelists, one original copy of a written application and five duplicates thereof shall be submitted.
Time-limit of payment for application fee
- Upon application for a decision with respect to registration of a JP domain name, payment of application fee might be required. By when shall such payment be made?
- Please make a payment to the Center within ten business days after the Center's receipt of a written application. If the payment is not made within this time frame, an application shall be deemed to be withdrawn and the proceedings shall be terminated.
Number of required applications
- Is it possible to make an application for a decision with respect to multiple registrations of JP domain names to the Center with one written application?
- Yes, it is possible if the multiple registrations of domain names belong to the same registrant.
Application by a foreigner
- Is it possible to make an application for a decision with respect to registration of domain name to the Center by a foreigner who has its address abroad? Is it possible to use foreign languages in the application procedure?
- Yes, it is possible to make an application by a foreigner or foreign entity who has its address abroad. (For more information, please contact the registration organization (JPRS).)
In principle, it is the Japanese language which is available for the application procedure.
Attachment of documentary evidence
- When we attach documentary evidence to a written application for a decision with respect to registration of a JP domain name, is it necessary that such documentary evidence be originals?
- The attached documentary evidence shall not necessarily be originals.
It can be a duplicate copy, an extract copy, or an original copy depending on the types of documentary evidence. Please contact the Center's secretariat for confirmation.
Appointment of a panel
Appointment of a panel
- How a panel is appointed?
- In the case where either of the parties (the complainant or the domain name registrant) chooses a three member panel, each party shall, in principle, select three candidates from among the Center's list of panelists, and then the Center shall appoint one panelist from each of those three candidates. The third panelist shall be appointed as a chief panelist from five candidates who have been presented to both parties by the Center.
In the case where neither of the parties (the complainant or the domain name registrant) chooses a three member panel, the Center shall appoint one panelist from the Center's list of panelists.
Panelists
- What are the backgrounds of individuals listed as panelist candidates who will comprise the Center's panel?
- Attorneys-at-law, patent attorneys, and academic experts who have adequate experience in the area of intellectual property are listed. Please refer to the "List of Panelist Candidates" contained on the Center's homepage.
Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center : http://www.ip-adr.gr.jp/panelist/
Replacement of panelists
- Are there any cases in which a panelist, who has been appointed by the Center, is replaced with another panelist in the course of the proceedings?
- In the case where any doubts have been pointed out as to the impartiality or independence of a panelist who has been appointed by the Center, such panelist can be replaced by the Center, according to need, after factual investigation is performed. In the case where you have any doubts as to the impartiality or independence of a panelist who has been appointed by the Center, please contact the Center's secretariat.
Neutrality and independence of panelists
- Are neutrality and independence of panelists maintained?
- Upon appointment of panelists, the Center takes great care with respect to the impartiality and independence of panelists. The Center requests that the panelists submit a written oath, to ensure that neutrality and independence are adequately maintained. In the case where any doubts exist as to the impartiality and independence of a panelist, replacement of a panelist is possible.
Investigation by the panel
- Does the panel renders a decision after conducting its own investigation, based on descriptions in documents submitted by the parties?
- The panel never conducts its own investigation. The panel shall render a decision based on statements and allegations as set forth in a written application and a written answer, as well as rebuttals thereto. However, the panel may, at its discretion, request additional statements or documents from either of the parties in addition to them.
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings
Appearance in the Center
- Is it necessary to appear in the Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center?
- No, it is not necessary for either the complainant or the registrant to physically appear before the panelists at the Center, since the Domain Name Dispute Resolution shall be examined and heard based on the submission of documents.
Duration for resolutions
- How long does it take to resolve a dispute?
- In principle, a decision shall be rendered within fifty five business days from application. That is, it can be said that the duration from application to rendering of decision shall be two months, give or take a few days, including weekends and holidays.
Procedure of proceedings
- How are the proceedings to be conducted if the registrant of a domain name dispute does not submit a written answer?
- In the case where a written answer is not submitted, the panel shall render a decision based on a written application (Procedural Rules Article 5 (f)). (When you refer to the decisions contained on the Center's homepage, you will see in how many cases written answers were not submitted.)
Number of times for submission of documents
- Are documents admitted only once?
- Yes. Additional submission of documents is admitted only when the panel requests so (Procedural Rules Article 12).
Relation with lawsuit
Difference between the Center's proceedings and lawsuit
- What is the difference between application to the court and application to the Center, with regard to domain name disputes?
- An application seeking an injunction against the use of domain name can be made to the court regarding domain name disputes, under the Unfair Competition Prevention Law or Trademark Law. However, an application for cancellation or transfer of a domain name registration has no legal basis. It is necessary to make an application for a decision to the Center to that effect, pursuant to the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" and the "Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy." In the case where an application is made to the Center, the Center shall keep the registration organization (JPRS) informed as to the commencement of the proceedings and the result of its decision with respect to such application. Upon this communication, the registration organization (JPRS) shall limit transfer, etc. of domain name until a decision is rendered.
Criteria in the Center's proceedings and lawsuit
- Is a decision rendered in a lawsuit based on the same criteria as in the Center's proceedings? If not, what is the difference?
- In a lawsuit, a decision is to be rendered pursuant to laws such as the Unfair Competition Prevention Law and Trademark Law, according to the gist of the claim. On the other hand, in the Center's proceedings, a decision is to be rendered pursuant to the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (JPDRP)," so the criteria, statute rules, are different. It is difficult to explain the difference between these two criteria, but you have to be careful that, in the Center's proceedings, a decision shall be rendered in a short term, within about two months, based, in principle, on only a written application, a written answer, and documentary evidence which is submitted with them. If the complainant fails to submit adequate evidence from the beginning, an application can be dismissed for lack of evidence. We would have to wait for an accumulation of future cases to fully understand the substantial difference between the two criteria.
Relationship between the Center's decision and a decision rendered by a court
- What kind of relationship is there between a decision in the Center's proceedings and a decision rendered by a court in a lawsuit?
- There is no direct relation between the two decisions. If the registrant files a lawsuit with the court within ten business days after a decision of cancellation or transfer of domain name is rendered, the implementation of a decision shall be postponed. Such implementation shall be postponed by the registration organization (JPRS) pursuant to "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (JPDRP)," but not by the Center.
Filling of suit
- In the case where the registrant of a domain name is dissatisfied with a decision of cancellation or transfer of a domain name, what kind of complaint shall it file with the court?
- "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (JPDRP)" does not provide for what kind of complaint shall be filed with the court. It is left to the registrant's judgment. So far, complaints seeking to confirm the right to use a domain name or a complaint seeking to confirm the non-existence of the right and to demand an injunction prohibiting of the use of a domain name have been filed, for example.
Another application
- An application for a decision of transfer had been dismissed, and then we won a lawsuit seeking an injunction against the use of a domain name against the registrant. Is it necessary for us to make an application for a decision to the Center once again?
- Under the current "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (JPDRP)," transfer without a decision of the Center is not allowed. It is necessary to make an application to the Center once again.
Other Matters
Legal consultation
- Does the Center provide legal consultation in connection with JP domain name disputes?
- Yes. Please contact the Center's secretariat.
Target date for implementation of decisions
- There are some cases in which decisions have already been rendered but implementation of such decisions have not been completed, despite the fact that it is now past the target date for such implementation. Have lawsuits been filed with respect to these cases?
- Implementation of decisions shall be conducted by the registration organization (JPRS). Please contact the registration organization (JPRS) (Please refer to the following).
Application for transfer
- There is a domain name which is similar to our trademark, and we are thinking about making an application for transfer. How can we obtain the address and name of the registrant?
- It is impossible for the Center to investigate. Please contact the registration organization (JPRS) (Please refer to the following).
Preparation of documents
- What kind of documents should the complainant prepare for the transfer procedure, in the case where a decision was rendered in a domain name dispute and a lawsuit is not filed.
- Please contact the registration organization (JPRS) (Please refer to the following).
Gathering information, Dispatch of lecturers
- We'd like to gather information about a domain name dispute or ask the Center to dispatch lecturers. What should we do?
- Please contact the Center's secretariat
Training of panelists and case managers
- How are panelist candidates or case managers trained
- The Center holds seminars on the topic of domain name disputes regularly, and conducts research concerning domestic and international domain name disputes.
JP Domain Name Registration Organization (JPRS)
Name: Japan Registry Service Co., Ltd.
Address: Chiyoda First Bldg. East 13F, 3-8-1 Nishi-Kanda Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0065
TEL: 03-5215-8451 FAX: 03-5215-8452 URL:http://jprs.co.jp/
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
* Decisions are available by clicking on the Decision column.
| Case Number | JP domain name | Commencement Date of Proceedings | Decision | Progression after Decision is rendered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2007-0010 | GUCCI.JP | 2007/12/28 | Transferring | |
| JP2007-0009 | MOZILLA.JP | 2007/10/19 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on January 15, 2008. |
| JP2007-0008 | FIREFOX.JP | 2007/11/02 | Dismissal | |
| JP2007-0007 | LOUISVUITTON.CO.JP | 2007/10/19 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on January 11, 2008. |
| JP2007-0006 | MONTBLANC.JP | 2007/10/9 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on January 15, 2008. |
| JP2007-0005 | YABUSAME.JP | 2007/9/28 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 20, 2007. |
| JP2007-0004 | 毎日.JP | 2007/10/3 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. The implementation of decision is pending. |
| JP2007-0003 | STV.CO.JP STV.JP |
2007/6/18 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 4, 2007. |
| JP2007-0002 | EDGE-CORE.CO.JP | 2007/6/19 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 7, 2007. |
| JP2007-0001 | BAIDU.CO.JP | 2007/1/17 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. The implementation of decision is pending. |
| JP2006-0008 | CYBERLINK.JP | 2006/11/24 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on February 20, 2007. |
| JP2006-0007 | DOWANGO.JP | 2006/09/28 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 20, 2006. |
| JP2006-0006 | RABITON.CO.JP | 2006/09/21 | Dismissal | |
| JP2006-0005 | STARBUCKS.JP | 2006/09/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 1, 2006. |
| JP2006-0004 | HYATT.JP | 2006/09/05 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 1, 2006. |
| JP2006-0003 | YOUNGNAILS.JP | 2006/10/03 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on January 25, 2007. |
| JP2006-0002 | THAWTE.JP | 2006/07/13 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on October 2, 2006. |
| JP2006-0001 | MERCEDES.JP | 2006/01/23 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on April 27, 2006. |
| JP2005-0011 | MY-RIMOWA.JP | 2005/10/12 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on January 18, 2006. |
| JP2005-0010 | SO-NETNE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0009 | SAKURANE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0008 | PLALAOR.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0007 | ODNNE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0006 | OCNNE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0005 | INTERQOR.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0004 | HI-HONE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0003 | BIGLOBENE.JP | 2005/07/07 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 21, 2005. |
| JP2005-0002 | WAL-MART.JP | 2005/05/24 | Withdrawal | |
| JP2005-0001 | WALMART.JP | 2005/05/24 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 1, 2005. |
| JP2004-0004 | TOEIC.CO.JP | 2004/11/05 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on February 3, 2005. |
| JP2004-0003 | ERMENEGILDOZEGNA.JP | 2004/09/28 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 13, 2004. |
| JP2004-0002 | NIHON-HIKIYA.GR.JP | 2004/06/09 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. Settlement was reached in a district court, and the proceedings were terminated on April 25, 2005. |
| JP2004-0001 | ENEMAGRA.CO.JP | 2004/05/24 | Dismissal | |
| JP2003-0008 | GAP.CO.JP | 2003/11/10 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on February 3, 2004. |
| JP2003-0007 | CORIAN.CO.JP CORIAN.JP |
2003/10/27 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on February 6, 2004. |
| JP2003-0006 | G-ZEGNA.CO.JP | 2003/10/2 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 24, 2003. |
| JP2003-0005 | IBM-NET.CO.JP | 2003/09/26 | Cancellation | The decision was implemented on December 11, 2003. |
| JP2003-0004 | IMMUNOCAL.CO.JP | 2003/08/26 | Cancellation | The decision was implemented on November 11, 2003. |
| JP2003-0003 | LASTMINUTE.JP | 2003/06/04 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on August 19, 2003. |
| JP2003-0001 | MOTORUP.CO.JP | 2003/04/03 | Cancellation | The decision was implemented on June 27, 2003. |
| JP2002-0007 | PHARMACIA.JP | 2002/06/26 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 11, 2002. |
| JP2002-0006 | JACCS.CO.JP | 2002/05/22 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on August 29, 2002. |
| JP2002-0005 | DIOR.CO.JP | 2002/05/14 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on November 27, 2002. |
| JP2002-0004 | BARNESANDNOBLE.JP | 2002/05/20 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 6, 2002. |
| JP2002-0003 | J-PHONE.CO.JP J-PHONE.JP |
2002/04/12 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on August 29, 2002. |
| JP2002-0001 | PRO-LEX.CO.JP | 2002/03/07 | Cancellation | The decision was implemented on July 16, 2002. |
| JP2001-0010 | IYBANK.CO.JP | 2001/09/04 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. After a trial in a district court, the decision was implemented on August 21, 2002. |
| JP2001-0009 | ARMANI.CO.JP | 2001/05/29 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on December 28, 2001. |
| JP2001-0008 | HTV.CO.JP HTV.JP |
2001/05/23 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on September 4, 2001. |
| JP2001-0007 | SUNKIST.CO.JP | 2001/04/06 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on July 13, 2001. |
| JP2001-0006 | RCC.CO.JP | 2001/04/04 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on July 31, 2001. |
| JP2001-0005 | MP3.CO.JP | 2001/03/16 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. After a trial in a district court, the decision was not implemented. |
| JP2001-0004 | REDHAT.CO.JP | 2001/02/08 | Withdrawal | |
| JP2001-0003 | ICOM.NE.JP | 2001/02/01 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on April 20, 2001. |
| JP2001-0002 | SONYBANK.CO.JP | 2001/01/25 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. After a trial in a district court, the decision was implemented on April 8, 2003. |
| JP2001-0001 | ITOYOKADO.CO.JP | 2001/01/15 | Transferring | The decision was implemented on April 5, 2001 |
| JP2000-0003 | YUZAWAYA.CO.JP | 2001/01/04 | Withdrawal | |
| JP2000-0002 | GOO.CO.JP | 2000/11/24 | Transferring | A lawsuit was filed with the court. After trials in a district court and a high court, the decision was implemented on November 28, 2002. |
| JP2000-0001 | AXIS.CO.JP | 2000/11/13 | Withdrawal |
Supplementary Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Article 1 (Purpose)
- The purpose of these supplementary rules are to provide more detailed guidance when the Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center (hereinafter, the "Center") conducts JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings based on "Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" (hereinafter, the "Procedural Rule") adopted by Japan Network Information Center (hereinafter, "JPNIC").
- When a complaint requesting the initiation of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings is made to the Center, the version of these supplementary rules in effect at the time such complaint is made shall be applied.
Article 2 (Definition)
- Among terms used in these supplementary rules, those terms which are the same as those used in the Procedural Rule shall have the same meaning as in the Procedural Rule.
- In these supplementary rules, "business days" shall mean days when the Center conducts its normal business, except Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, and other days as prescribed by the Center.
Article 3 (Submission Procedure of Documents)
- Documents, which are to be submitted pursuant to Article 3, Paragraph (b) or Article 5, Paragraph (b) of the Procedural Rule, shall be submitted by either of the two following:
- By postal service; or
- By e-mail (except those relevant documents which cannot be sent by e-mail).
- When documents are submitted to the Center under this article, Paragraph (a), Item (i), three copies of duplicates thereof shall be attached thereto.
- When documents are sent to the Center by e-mail under this article, Paragraph (a), Item (ii), they shall be sent to an e-mail address which the Center designates separately.
- The Center shall keep the documents submitted to the Center, separately.
Article 4 (Examination of Written Complaint)
- In the case where a written complaint is submitted, the Center shall, after the payment of the required fee(s) have been made pursuant to Article 19 of the Procedural Rule, examine whether the written complaint complies with the Procedural Rule, these supplementary rules, and the "JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy" (hereinafter, the "Policy") which has been adopted by JPNIC and is a part of the "Registration Rule" established by Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, "JPRS") by being referred to therefrom, and in the case where any defect is found, it shall give notice to the Complainant to that effect.
- In the case where the Complainant does not correct the defect as provided in the preceding paragraph within five days (business days) as prescribed for in Article 4 Paragraph (b) of the Procedural Rule, such complaint shall be deemed withdrawn. Provided, in this case, the Complainant may make another complaint.
Article 5 (Sending of Written Complaint)
The Center shall conduct the examination of the written complaint as provided for in the preceding article, Paragraph (a), and in the case where no defect in the complaint is found, it shall send the written complaint to the Registrant within three days (business days) from the date of receipt of fee as prescribed for in Article 19 of the Procedural Rule.
Article 6 (Chief Panelist)
In the case where the Complainant or Registrant choose a three member panel, the third panelist, who shall be designated by the Center pursuant to the third sentence of Article 6, Paragraph (e) of the Procedural Rule, and shall be a chief panelist who currently presides over JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings.
Article 7 (Correspondence and Notice Procedure)
- The correspondence between the Center and appointed panelists shall be undertaken via telephone, e-mail, or by other means as prescribed by the Center.
- Forms of the correspondence and notice documents, which are to be sent to the Complainant, Registrant, and panelists from the Center, shall be the forms as prescribed by the Center separately.
Article 8 (Fee)
The fee required for use of the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings shall be prescribed by "Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Fee" which is a part hereof.
Article 9 (Limit on Number of Characters)
- The grounds for complaint shall be written within 10,000 words (including punctuation).
- Answer to the statements and allegations in the written complaint shall be written within 10,000 words (including punctuation).
- With regard to decisions and dissenting opinions, no limit on the number of characters shall be imposed.
Article 10 (Amendment)
The Center may amend these supplementary rules at any time and in such case where the Policy or the Procedural Rule is amended, or where the Center deems it necessary.
Article 11 (Exclusion of Liability)
The Center, panelists, case managers and staff of the Center, and any other relevant persons shall not be liable as to the content and result of the JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings, except in the case of intentional tort.
Supplementary Provisions
These supplementary rules shall come into force effective October 19, 2000.
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Fee Rules
Article 1 (Purpose)
These rules provide for fees in connection with JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceedings handled by the Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center (hereinafter, the "Center") as an authorized Provider. These rules shall be a part of the "Supplementary Procedural Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy."
Article 2 (Fee)
- The Complainant shall, when it submits a written application, pay the entire fee, as provided for in Appendix 1, to the Center.
- Once the fee has been paid to the Center such fee is non-refundable. Provided however, in the case where an application is withdrawn before the appointment of panelists, a refund, minus a 30,000 yen deduction, will be made to the complainant and in the case where an application is withdrawn after the appointment of panelists has been made, yet before a decision has been rendered, an amount decided at the Center's discretion, and taking into consideration the progress of the case up to that point, shall be reimbursed to the Complainant.
- Where the Registrant chose to increase the number of panelists from one to three in a written answer, it shall immediately disburse the same amount of fee as disbursed by the Complainant to the Center.
Article 3 (Hearing Fee)
In the case where hearing proceedings have been initiated, the Complainant and Registrant shall each pay to the Center 15,000 yen as the relevant hearing fee, before the date of hearing.
Article 4 (Other Costs)
In principle, the Center shall not charge the Complainant and Registrant for costs other than those provided for in Articles 2 and 3 of these rules. Provided however, costs associated with, interpretation, expert testimony, daily allowance for witnesses, traveling expenses and accommodation costs in the case of panelists' business trip, and the like, shall be borne equally by the Complainant and Registrant, and shall be paid to the Center in advance.
Article 5 (Consumption Tax)
The amount of fees and other costs as provided for in these rules do not include the consumption tax imposed on the Center's services pursuant to the Consumption Tax Act and shall be levied separately (Law No.108 of 1988).
Supplementary Provisions
These rules shall come into force effective October 19, 2000.
Appendix
1DIn cases that are heard by one (1) panelist, the fee shall be
180,000 yen. Provided however, in cases where the number of the subject domain names in the same written application is four or more, 10,000 yen for each additional domain beyond the fourth domain shall be assessed.
2DIn cases that are heard by three (3) panelists, the feel shall be
360,000 yen. Provided however, in cases where the number of the subject domain names in the same written application is four or more, 20,000 yen for each additional domain beyond the fourth domain shall be assessed.
All payment shall be sent to the following bank account. Any transmittance fee shall be borne by the transmitter of such payment.
Bank Account:
Japan Intellectual Property Arbitration Center
Mitsui Sumitomo Bank Kasumigaseki branch office
Ordinary Deposit Account No. 6559091











