It is possible for parties themselves to make a complaint for the proceedings of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution and an answer thereto or through their agents. It is possible to appoint attorneys-at-law or patent attorneys as an agent. The Center is designated by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry as an arbitral organization in which patent attorneys are able to act as an agent independently under Article 4, Paragraph 2, Subparagraph 2 of the Patent Attorney Law.
JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Agents
- Services
-
- Consultation
- Mediation
- Arbitration
- JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- Outline of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
- Process Flow of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- Agents
- Panelists
- List of Panelists
- Submission of Complaint and Answer
- Fees for Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- Forms for Proceedings of Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- Rules for JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- FAQ of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution
- Case List of JP Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
- Center's Advisory Opinion
- Center's Essential Patent Evaluation
- Evaluation of Contribution of Patent to Business
- Procedural flowcharts for evaluating standard essential patents
- Calls for patents that are essential for applicable standards
- Procedures for applying for the standard essential patent evaluation
- Applicable standards (Appendix 1 under Article 2 of Procedural Rules for Essential Patent Evaluation)
- The format of Oath and Consent Form designated by ULDAGE Inc. (Appendix 2 under Article 3-3-4 of Procedural Rules for Essential Patent Evaluation)
- Confirmatory evaluation of essential patents for the digital cable broadcasting standards
- Confirmatory evaluation for the applicable CATV (UHDTV) standards
- Advisory Opinion on Operability(AOO)
- Evaluation of Contribution of Patent to Business